[EVA] Concurrency tangent (WAS: Alternate Rei on DVD cover) (critique on V, again)

[EB]

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:27 PM, V V <frumious99 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> one could easily say that the "experts" of the past 14 years, far from
> being objective - Napier, Jaffe, et al - were simply pushing their own,
> non-objective, interpretations on everyone else.
>

Objective and non-objective is highly subjective.


> I've at least got as much right to promote my explanation of the series as
> the fools who passed off their interpretation as fact for years


That I can agree with, just like how every other fan has as any right to
approach the fandom as they see fit, be it by analyzing, over analyzing,
writing fanfiction, or collecting doujinshi, otherwise, who are you to
discredit and yet demand not be discredited?


> I'm *trying* to base things on "fact" again", not the ol' "every theory is
> correct and its an ink blot" routine.
>

You're trying to make everyone conform to *YOUR* groupthink, something *YOU*
always accused Aaron, Rachel and everyone at EGF of doing.

Hello irony.


> But putting that aside....<snip>
>

That still doesn't answer Peter's question regarding the ending, instead, as
always, when someone dares question the validity of your point of view you
do everything BUT defend it with facts, instead you call out on the
"experts" you loath so much, on the "pretentious, elitist fanboys" yo
publicly hate yet so secretly take information from; you are a plagiarizing
work in progress, too lazy to do proper research, and to presumptuous to
think you could be wrong.